MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Zwei neue habituell abweichende Arten der Gattung Lesteva Latreille, 1796 aus Sibirien (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Omaliinae).

2000· article· de· W3111471298 on OpenAlexaff
Lothar Zerche

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Entomology · 2000
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsVisions of Science Network for Learning
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lesteva brathinoides sp. n. aus dem östlichen Sajan-Gebirge und Lesteva sajanensis sp. n. aus dem westlichen Sajan-Gebirge werden beschrieben und mit näher verwandten Lesteva-Arten und etwas ähnlichen, aber nicht näher verwandten Brathinus-Arten verglichen. Habitus und Aedoeagus der neuen Arten werden jeweils abgebildet. Die jeweilige systematische Stellung der neuen Arten innerhalb von Lesteva wird diskutiert, bleibt aber ungeklärt.Nomenklatorische Handlungenbrathinoides Zerche, 2000 (Lesteva), spec. n.sajanensis Zerche, 2000 (Lesteva), spec. n.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to EntomologySame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207