Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les premiers écrits sur le cinéma international, dont la plupart soumettaient les cultures de l’image en mouvement aux impératifs dogmatiques des cinémas nationaux, révèlent les limites associées au choix d’aborder le sujet sous l’angle du lieu. Le « cinéma international 2.0 », illustrant l’effort des chercheurs pour relancer le sous-domaine, a été conçu en réaction à ces limites. La grille de circulation est une méthode importante qu’utilisent les chercheurs participant à cette relance du cinéma international, qui met en relief la façon dont les films sont mobilisés dans les vastes réseaux regroupant les canaux matériels et virtuels. L’auteure se demande s’il se peut qu’une nouvelle limitation de l’expression réside dans l’accent mis sur le cinéma, évoquant à titre d’exemple le cas du cinéma « médian » de Calcutta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".