MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Michael Ignatieff y la biografía de Isaiah Berlin

2020· article· es· W3111508272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
María Eugenia Arias, Lilia Carbajal Arenas, Teresita Quiroz Ávila

Bibliographic record

VenueFuentes Humanísticas · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen Michael Ignatieff, historiador canadiense escribio la biografia de Isaiah Berlin para mostrar las importantes aportaciones que hizo a la historia de las ideas sobre la Libertad, uno de los principios del Liberalismo. Al biografo le interesaba tambien conocer la influencia de la participacion de Berlin en el Servicio Britanico de Informacion con sede en Nueva York y en la embajada de Inglaterra en Washington durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Palabras clave : Historia, biografia, liberalismo, libertad. Abstract Michael Ignatieff, a Canadian historian wrote the biography of Isaiah Berlin to show the important contributions that Berlin made to the history of ideas about Freedom, one of the principles of Liberalism. The biographer was also interested in knowing the influence of Berlin's participation in the British Information Service based in New York and in the British embassy in Washington during the Second World War. Key words : History, biography, Liberalism, Freedom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuentes HumanísticasSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207