Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteure fait valoir l’importance d’élargir l’éventail des méthodologies historiques pour changer les frontières géographiques de la discipline des études cinématographiques. Dans le cadre de la décolonisation du domaine, l’auteure propose une extension de la catégorie même du cinéma comme objet d’analyse ; une expansion des modes de production du savoir que nous jugeons légitimes afin d’inclure ceux qui trouvent leur origine au-delà du contexte universitaire euro-américain comme étant constitutif notamment des approches historiographiques ; et, enfin, l’élaboration d’une compréhension systémique et relationnelle des géographies plus étendues qui participent à ces histoires du « monde », y compris un espace géopolitique historique grandement négligé entre l’ancien « Second » monde et le « Tiers » monde (soit l’ex-bloc communiste et l’hémisphère Sud).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".