MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111569945 · doi:10.1063/5.0033825

Buoyancy effects on turbulent displacement of viscoplastic fluids from strongly eccentric horizontal annuli

2020· article· en· W3111569945 on OpenAlexafffund
Majid Bizhani, I.A. Frigaard

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationSchlumberger Foundation
KeywordsBuoyancyMechanicsTurbulenceAnnulus (botany)PhysicsDisplacement (psychology)Fluid dynamicsShear stressViscosityNewtonian fluidThermodynamicsMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an experimental and numerical study of the turbulent displacement of viscoplastic fluids in a horizontal eccentric annulus. Several experiments where a weighted Newtonian fluid displaces a yield stress fluid under a turbulent flow condition are presented and discussed. These are also used to validate the turbulent displacement model that we use in this study. The model simulator is used to study the mechanisms by which buoyancy influences turbulent displacement in more detail and outside of the range of our experiments. Extreme cases where the generated wall shear stress of the displacing fluid is smaller than the yield stress of the displaced Carbopol are investigated. The results show that buoyancy is ineffective in countering the tendency of the fluid to disperse along the wide gap of the annulus. In both model and experiment, the outcome of the displacement appears to be controlled by the yield stress of the in situ fluid and the eccentricity of the annulus. For fully turbulent flows, the viscosity of the displaced fluid has a negligible effect, and having also negated buoyancy, there appears to be no mechanism to stabilize the turbulent displacement of a yield stress fluid in a severely eccentric horizontal annulus. For the underlying industrial process, this means that extreme caution should be used in designing turbulent flow displacements for horizontal wells. There are two solutions: (i) increase the flow rate to generate sufficient stresses (usually not possible due to pump and formation fracture pressure limits) and (ii) ensure a better centralized annulus (unpopular because of operational constraints).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207