MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111598421 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07144

Insights into Syngas Combustion on a Defective NiO Surface for Chemical Looping Combustion: Oxygen Migration and Vacancy Effects

2020· article· en· W3111598421 on OpenAlexafffund
Yue Yuan, Xiuqin Dong, Luis Ricardez‐Sandoval

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilCompute Canada
KeywordsSyngasChemical looping combustionAdsorptionCombustionOxygenDensity functional theoryNon-blocking I/ODiffusionChemical engineeringCatalysisChemistryMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryThermodynamicsComputational chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A thorough theoretical analysis of vacancy effects on syngas combustion was conducted for the chemical looping combustion (CLC) process using NiO as an oxygen carrier (OC). A density functional theory (DFT) analysis was conducted to provide new insights into the effects of surface vacancies on OC behavior such as O migration, syngas adsorption, and syngas oxidation. The results showed that the vacancies are expected to promote the subsequent oxidation reactions, which might come from the lower state energies of the reactants, the syngas adsorption configurations on the defective surface. Furthermore, the proposed reaction mechanisms showed that the presence of the defective sites benefited the syngas oxidation by reducing the energy barriers of the CO and H 2 oxidation reactions. In particular, H 2 oxidation changed from a 3-step process on a perfect surface (i.e., without vacancies) to a 2-step process on a defective surface. Moreover, the CO oxidation reaction was shown to dominate the overall syngas oxidation process. In addition, the outward diffusion direction of oxygen migration was observed from the bulk side to the surface. The proposed CO and H 2 reaction kinetics were validated against the experimental data using a DFT-based mean-field (MF) model. An electronic analysis was also performed to further support the intrinsic effects of surface vacancies obtained from the DFT analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207