MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111612896 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v5i5.1525

Shared Priorities, Data and Reporting: Improving Access to Mental Health, Addictions and Home Care Services

2020· article· en· W3111612896 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kathleen Morris, Brent Diverty, Natalie Damiano

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Health Information
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Presentation (obstetrics)ComparabilityMental healthGovernment (linguistics)BusinessPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

IntroductionAround the world, the need for mental health, addictions and home care services is growing. Government commitment and collective efforts to bridge data gaps, develop indicators and publicly report results are key elements in Canada’s efforts to improve access.
 Objectives and ApproachThis symposium will demonstrate how a coalition of stakeholders united to use real-world data to measure progress and drive change. Each presentation highlights a different aspect of the project with participant interaction, aiming for the Canadian context to spark knowledge exchange across sectors and countries:
 
 Presentation 1 - Coalitions and consensus (10 min.): processes and engagement for successful collaboration between governments, providers, measurement experts and people with lived experiences to select and develop indicators
 
 Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)
 
 
 Presentation 2 - Standards and data infrastructure (10 min.): new standards to enhance data comparability and strengthened data infrastructure to support measurement and reporting
 
 Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)
 
 
 Presentation 3 - Indicator development (10 min.): the indicator development cycle, methodological approaches using linked and partial data, and development strategies for new concepts
 
 Facilitated Q&A (5 min.)
 
 
 Presentation 4 - Public reporting and policy impact (10 min.): describes how public reporting supports sustained commitments and energizes change using targeted tools and messages
 
 Facilitated Q&A (15 min.)
 
 
 
 ResultsPublic reporting began in 2019, with 3 new indicators released annually over 4 years. Initial reporting provides a baseline to track improvements, and a starting point for health system planners to learn from peers across Canada. The indicators have been a catalyst to fill important data gaps in emergency and home care services.
 Conclusion / ImplicationsThrough shared priorities, coalitions and linked data, information gaps are being filled to drive advancements in access to mental health and addictions services, and home care. Lessons learned in Canada can be adapted internationally to galvanize needed improvements in these sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.280
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data ScienceSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207