Bibliographic record
Abstract
Suite à de nombreux affrontements entre policiers et punks à Montréal et à la difficulté de ces derniers d’avoir accès à des salles de concert, un projet de salle voit le jour, mené par un groupe de punks souhaitant se doter d’un espace autogéré. Prise en étau entre logiques DIY et instrumentalisation de la culture, la salle de l’X est ainsi mise sur pied en 1998 et devient rapidement un lieu accueillant concerts, projets d’intégration sociale et ateliers d’éducation. À partir d’une archive de documents de l’époque et d’entrevues menées avec des personnes ayant travaillé à l’X, cette contribution se penche à la fois sur la logique mobilisant la salle comme outil de gestion spatiale d’un « problème punk » perçu par les autorités municipales, et celle du DIY propre au quotidien des personnes y œuvrant ainsi que du développement de la communauté punk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".