Motor-driven autonomous system for controlling beamline iris diaphragm apertures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the collinear apparatus for laser spectroscopy and applied sciences (COALA) at TU Darmstadt, collinear laser spectroscopy is applied to perform high-precision measurements of atomic transition frequencies and high voltages in an ultra-high vacuum beamline. In such laser spectroscopy beamlines, iris diaphragms are used to reduce ion beam divergence, and to ensure a good laser and ion beam overlap. Since the system that controls the diameter of the apertures presents strong hysteresis, an automated adjustment is desirable to enhance reproducibility in the aperture settings, and to reduce the effort in performing measurements where different diameters are required, especially in alternating collinear and anti-collinear measurements. To achieve this, the Iris Mover system was designed and implemented. The Iris Mover system consists of motor-driven iris apertures which can be easily controlled by users through a computer, and which accounts for hysteresis effects. Here, we explain the design process of the Iris Mover and demonstrate and discuss its functionality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".