MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111642942 · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100273

Factors influencing the health-seeking behaviors of women with advanced stages of breast cancer in Southwestern Nigeria: An interpretive description study

2020· article· en· W3111642942 on OpenAlex
Rev. Sr. Agatha Ogunkorode, Lorraine Holtslander, Linda Ferguson, Johanna E. Maree, June Anonson, Vivian R. Ramsden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsPrince Albert Grand CouncilUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerNonprobability samplingThematic analysisHealth carePsychological interventionDescriptive statisticsQualitative researchMedicineBreast cancer awarenessFamily medicinePsychologyHealth belief modelNursingCancerHealth educationPopulationPublic healthEnvironmental healthSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates the survival rate from breast cancer in Nigerian women is 48.9%. Little is known about the health-seeking behaviors and the factors that influence women with advanced breast cancer in Southwestern Nigeria to seek care. This paper presents the factors influencing the health-seeking activities of women with advanced breast cancer from the time the participants observed breast changes until they presented in the hospital for care. Qualitative methods, specifically Interpretive Description (ID), was employed within the conceptual framework of the Health Belief Model (HBM). A University Human Ethics Review Board (REB) approved the study, while operational approval was granted by the hospital where the data collection took place. Thirty women with advanced breast cancer were recruited for the study using purposive sampling. Data was collected by engaging the participants in audio-recorded, semi-structured, face-to-face, one-on-one interviews guided by open-ended questions and a demographic form. The interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis, while the demographic information was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The study identified motivating and enabling factors as well as barriers to engaging in health-seeking behaviors. Breast changes, interpretation of symptoms, the financial challenges of breast cancer treatments, sociocultural factors, and a desire to live influenced the participants’ health-seeking behaviors. Knowledge of these factors may help nurses and other healthcare providers to consider their patients’ health beliefs and perceptions, thereby empowering nurses to provide comprehensive, holistic, contextually relevant and efficient care to their patients. Community interventions should include strategies to raise breast cancer awareness and reduce the stigma associated with the illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it