A 14-moment maximum-entropy description of electrons in crossed electric and magnetic fields
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 14-moment maximum-entropy system of equations is applied to the description of non-equilibrium electrons in crossed electric and magnetic fields and in the presence of low collisionality, a characteristic of low-temperature plasma devices. The flexibility of this formulation is analyzed through comparison with analytical results for steady-state non-equilibrium velocity distribution functions and against particle-based solutions of the time-dependent kinetic equation. Electric and magnetic source terms are derived for the 14-moment equations, starting from kinetic theory. A simplified collision term based on the Bhatnagar–Gross–Krook operator is formulated to describe the collision of electrons with background neutrals, accounting for the large mass disparity and energy exchange. An approximated expression is proposed for the collision frequency, to include the effect of the electrons' drift velocity, showing good accuracy in the considered conditions. The capabilities of the proposed 14-moment closure to accurately capture the non-equilibrium behavior of electrons for space homogeneous problems under conditions representative of those found in Hall thrusters are demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it