Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP), sometimes known as stable free radical polymerization (SFRP), is considered one of the main types of reversible deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) that have emerged as a major advance in polymer synthesis in the past 30 years. This review examines NMP's development from a uniquely Canadian perspective. Inspired by reports of a reversible equilibrium between the TEMPO persistent radical and a growing polymeric radical chain, researchers at the Xerox Research Centre of Canada (XRCC) reported radical polymerizations of styrene with hallmarks typically associated with living polymerizations: linear degree of polymerization of with conversion, narrow molecular weight distributions, and ability to re‐initiate the chain end with additional monomer. This effort expanded to polymerizations in dispersed aqueous media (eg, miniemulsion) and to polymerizations directed for various architectures (block, graft, star), but NMP was ultimately generally limited to styrenic monomers. Consequently, NMP trailed other RDRP methods, such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and reversible addition fragmentation transfer polymerization (RAFT), due to its limited monomer choice. With the advent of second‐generation alkoxyamine initiators, however, the range of monomers polymerizable in a controlled manner greatly expanded to include acrylates, acrylamides, and eventually methacrylates (under certain conditions), providing renewed impetus towards using NMP. Consequently, Canadian researchers applied these new alkoxyamines for more versatile polymers, resulting in products such as stimuli‐responsive polymers, CO 2 ‐switchable latexes, bio‐hybrid composites, organic photovoltaic materials, and photolithographic materials. The chronological progression of the developments in NMP from various Canadian laboratories highlights these achievements in new polymeric materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".