Prognostic Value of Muscle Mass Measured via Brain Computed Tomography in Neurocritically Ill Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background To investigate whether skeletal muscle mass estimated via brain computed tomography (CT) can be used to predict neurological outcomes in neurocritically ill patients. Methods This is a retrospective, observational study. Adult patients who were admitted to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) in tertiary hospital from January 2010 to September 2019 were eligible. We included patients who were hospitalized in the neurosurgical ICU for more than 7 days. Cross-sectional areas of paravertebral muscle at the first cervical vertebra level (C1-CSA) and temporalis muscle thickness (TMT) on brain CT were measured to evaluate skeletal muscle mass. Primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale score at 3 months. Results Among 189 patients, 167 (88.4%) survived until discharge from the hospital. Of these survivors, 81 (42.9%) patients had favorable neurologic outcomes. Initial TMT values and follow-up TMT values were higher in patients with favorable neurologic outcome compared to those with poor neurological outcome (p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). Initial the C1-CSA/body surface area was greater in patients with poor neurological outcome than in those with favorable outcome (p = 0.029). In multivariable analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.543–2.724), BMI (adjusted OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.638–0.849), use of mannitol (adjusted OR: 27.45, 95% CI: 4.833–155.860), change of C1-CSA (adjusted OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.054–1.761), and change of TMT (adjusted OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.028–1.576) were significantly associated with poor neurological outcome (Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Chi-square = 11.4, df = 8, p = 0.178) with the areas under curve of 0.803 (95% CI 0.740–0.866) using 10-fold cross validation method. Especially, the risk of poor neurologic outcome was proportional to changes of C1-CSA and TMT. Conclusions In this study, the follow-up skeletal muscle mass at first week from ICU admission, based on changes in C1-CSA and TMT, was associated with neurological prognosis in neurocritically ill patients. Eventually, brain CT-measured sarcopenia may be helpful in predicting poor neurological outcomes in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".