MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111743738 · doi:10.26770/phoinix.v26.2n02

TEJIENDO UN DOBLE MANTO PURPÚREO: TRAMAS FEMENINAS EN ILÍADA

2020· article· es· W3111743738 on OpenAlex
Elsa Rodríguez Cidre

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhoînix · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterary and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El mundo de lo textil es parte integral de casi toda cultura humana y cumple en cada una de ellas distintas funciones sociales. En el ámbito de la épica griega la referencia a lo textil es constante. El poeta suele demorarse en las descripciones de vestuario o en las referencias a labores textiles que delata un conocimiento directo. En la Grecia antigua este mundo tiene una ligazón íntima con las mujeres porque constituye un trabajo casi exclusivamente femenino y porque, en tanto suplemento del cuerpo, ejerce un papel clave en la construcción de la propia identidad femenina. Los elementos textiles (como otros objetos del oîkos) sirven asimismo de medio de comunicación no verbal para las mujeres, lo que permite ampliar el escaso margen de acción y de expresión de unos personajes que, prescriptivamente, tienen una agencia limitada en la épica. Es nuestro objetivo en el presente artículo analizar los tejidos de Helena en el canto III y de Andrómaca en el XXII para establecer comparaciones y determinar similitudes y diferencias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it