Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent discussions of nutritionism have centred on the ways in which the science of nutrition has led to particular understandings of food and health. These discussions have overlooked the ways in which, in earlier historical times, food, the body and health have been constructed. The genealogies of nutrition and of dietetics are quite separate, although in present day terms the two areas are often combine, or even used interchangably. Central to the development of each, however, was the belief in moderation of appetite and of pleasure. These issues are played out most clearly in Christian understandings of food and the body, which greatly influenced the development of nutrition and of dietetics. Knowledge of what foods were optimal or detrimental to the body, was duplicated into knowledge of moral behaviours where 'good' and 'bad' were regarded to be as much about the morality of eating as of the science of food. These views on eating are evident in present day discourses where guilt about eating, especially foods that are pleasurable, abounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it