Hybrid Event-Triggered and Impulsive Control Strategy for Multiagent Systems With Switching Topologies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the hybrid event-triggered and impulsive consensus problems for leaderless and leader-following multiagent systems (MASs) with switching topologies. Based on the state information of neighboring agents at event-triggered moments and impulsive instants, a hybrid event-triggered and impulsive control strategy (HETICS) is designed to reduce the communication frequency between neighboring agents and to ensure consensus of leaderless and leader-following MASs. By utilizing the Lyapunov direct method, some consensus criteria are obtained for leaderless and leader-following MASs with switching topologies. It is shown that the HETICS excludes the Zeno behavior. Several numerical examples and simulations are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed consensus strategy and a comparison with previous consensus control methods is given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it