MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111776741

Teoría, metodología e intencionalidad etnomuseológicas. Revisión de dos casos: la cultura tradicional vasca y el totem de Cunshewa

2000· article· es· W3111776741 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBidebarrieta: Revista de humanidades y ciencias sociales de Bilbao · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotographic and Visual Arts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesTotemArtHistoryArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El objetivo de este trabajo es de tipo teorico y comparativo y pretende realizar una reflexion en torno a la presencia y la practica etnomuseologica actual en la ciudad de Bilbao. La reflexion se detiene en un tipo de museo especifico tal y como es el etnologico y etnografico, presente en diversas localidades del Pais Vasco. Esta gira alrededor de dos conceptos que nos parecen fundamentales: el de elemento de la cultura material y el del espacio. Para ello se han tomado como referencias principales para este trabajo, por una parte el Museo Arqueologico, Etnografico e Historico Vasco, de Bilbao y por otra aspectos etnomuseologicos del Musee des Civilisations de Canada, como puntos de contraste.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it