MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111792797 · doi:10.18174/532544

Monitor Voortgang Verduurzaming Voedselketens : dierlijke eiwitten en vis

2020· report· nl· W3111792797 on OpenAlexaff
W.H.M. Baltussen, Richard L. Simmons, S.R.M. Janssens, Emil Georgiev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagenl
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityLivestockBusinessAgricultural scienceEnvironmental planningManureAnimal healthNatural resource economicsEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental protectionGeographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyForestryBiologyEconomicsAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food consumption and production in the Netherlands is associated with several sustainability problems. The Monitor Progress on Sustainable Food Chains (MVVV) identified the main sustainability issues (‘hotspots’) for the domain ‘animal protein and fish’. Based on public data, it was determined to what extent progress has been made on these hotspots and their related objectives in the past 5 to 10 years. Hotspots such as ‘the environmental impact of the cultivation of animal feed’ and ‘use of antibiotics in livestock’ have reached their sustainability goals in the last years. Hotspots that have seen little progress and/or have some areas of improvement are anti-fouling problems in fisheries, animal welfare, air quality, energy use, health, safety and welfare of employees, enteric methane emissions and manure management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207