MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111795322 · doi:10.21307/connections-2019.017

The ‘GROW Social Network’ datasets

2020· article· en· W3111795322 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sabina B. Gesell, Evan C. Sommer, Shari L. Barkin

Bibliographic record

VenueConnections · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesOffice of Behavioral and Social Sciences ResearchNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsIntervention (counseling)Cohesion (chemistry)MultiplexBaseline (sea)PsychologyMeasure (data warehouse)MedicineComputer scienceBiologyData miningBioinformaticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The GROW Social Network datasets were compiled as part of a 3-year community-based family-based pediatric obesity prevention intervention (N = 610). The datasets include (i) multiplex edges between adult study participants at four timepoints (baseline, 3, 12, and 36 mon), and (ii) multiplex edges within small intervention-only subgroups (30 groups of approximately 10 adult intervention participants) and a previously validated self-report measure of perceived cohesion at three timepoints (3, 6, and 12 wk). Actor attributes are richly characterized in a linkable dataset.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConnectionsSame topicHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207