Research on the Current Situation and Practice of the Integration of National Traditional Horse Racing Festival and Tourism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
National traditional sports events carry the task of developing the history and culture of ethnic minorities and are the soul of the development of tourism. National traditional sports events, cultural industries, and tourism industries interact and intersect each other, and the three are integrated and developed. The national traditional sports tourism industry is an important development direction for developing local culture, improving the tourism industry, promoting economic restructuring, and leveraging the local economy. The integration of national traditional sports and tourism is a new growth point for the national economy, which is not only conducive to the improvement of the local economic level, but also improves the development of the industrial structure, thereby promoting the sound development of the national traditional sports industry. In view of this, this research focuses on an in-depth and systematic study of the current situation and practice of the integration of national traditional horse racing festival and tourism, mainly discussing the following six aspects: The first is the analysis of the necessity of the integration of national traditional sports and tourism. The second is the analysis of the mechanism power, policy support and economic basis for the integration and development of national traditional horse racing and tourism. The third is the analysis of the development of Tibetan horse racing festival. The fourth is the analysis on the value and predicaments of the integrated development of Tibetan horse racing festival and tourism. The fifth is a case study of the practice of integrated development of Tibetan horse racing festival and tourism
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".