MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111810575 · doi:10.3138/topia-007

What Is Quarantine: Cruise Ships, Lepers and the Temptation of Christ

2020· article· en· W3111810575 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Greg Bird

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemptationQuarantineCruiseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakTRACE (psycholinguistics)HistorySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)LawGeographyPolitical sciencePsychologyMedicineEngineeringVirologyBiologyEcologySocial psychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper uses the three main etymological sources of quarantine (the 14th-century Venetian practice of isolating ships, Moses’s Law Concerning Leprosy, and the Temptation of Christ) as heuristic devices to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the division of life between vital lives and biological labourers. I trace this phenomenon through the first two stages of this pandemic. The first stage took place roughly from early February to mid-March. The central figure during this stage was the cruise ship, including the division between passengers (vital lives) and seafarers (biological labourers). The second stage ran roughly from mid-March until the protests against the division of life erupted in late May. I focus on the broader distinction between essential workers and remote professional workers. I use the biblical references to examine how each group experienced quarantine measures during this second stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.036
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural StudiesSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207