The International Sedimentary Geosciences Congress (ISGC) 2021: An opportunity to shape the future of sedimentary geosciences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| December 04, 2020 The International Sedimentary Geosciences Congress (ISGC) 2021: An opportunity to shape the future of sedimentary geosciences Andrea Fildani; Andrea Fildani 1The Deep Time Institute, P.O. Box 27552, Austin, Texas, U.S.A. 3Chairs of the ISGC Scientific and Program Committees Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jean C.C. Hsieh Jean C.C. Hsieh 2Sedimentary Geology Consultants, 2033 42 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta T2T 2M8, Canada 3Chairs of the ISGC Scientific and Program Committees Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Journal of Sedimentary Research (2020) 90 (10): 1370–1371. https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.126 Article history received: 27 Jul 2020 accepted: 01 Oct 2020 first online: 04 Dec 2020 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Andrea Fildani, Jean C.C. Hsieh; The International Sedimentary Geosciences Congress (ISGC) 2021: An opportunity to shape the future of sedimentary geosciences. Journal of Sedimentary Research 2020;; 90 (10): 1370–1371. doi: https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.126 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyJournal of Sedimentary Research Search Advanced Search The 1st International Sedimentary Geosciences Congress (ISGC) was conceived a few years ago as a unique opportunity for the broad sedimentary geosciences community to come together in a time of transformations. The aim of the congress is to allow the community to express, plan, and implement what we all know are necessary changes to progress into the new decades with new motivations, ideas, and purpose, fine-tuned to the concepts of a sustainable future. The Congress, organized by SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology), was scheduled to take place in Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, at the end of April of 2020. The rapid... You do not currently have access to this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.110 | 0.057 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".