One-array Differential Evolution Algorithm with a Novel Replacement Strategy for Numerical Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential Evolution (DE) algorithm is an efficient metaheuristic algorithm in solving complex real-world optimization problems. DE algorithm benefits from two populations for updating individuals, while it might cause memory problems in practice during solving large-scale optimization problems; especially when they are used in an embedded system. One strategy to tackle this problem is utilizing a one-array scheme which benefits from only one population, leading to a half-space memory. This paper proposes a novel DE algorithm based on one-array DE and a random replacement strategy; it adds an additional competition to the selection operator to make better use of the new individual that it might be potentially noteworthy. The positive feature of the introduced replacement strategy is that it does not need any extra computational budget. Also, due to employing one-array strategy, the proposed scheme has a lower memory complexity. Our experiments on CEC-2017 benchmark function with dimensions 30, 50, and 100 clearly illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed DE algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it