MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111886699 · doi:10.1002/alz.044819

Mild behavioral impairment is associated with atrophy in Alzheimer's disease‐related regions in non‐demented older adults

2020· article· en· W3111886699 on OpenAlexaff
Veronika Matušková, Zahinoor Ismail, Tomáš Nikolai, Hana Marková, Kateřina Čechová, Jan Laczó, Zuzana Nedelská, Ondřej Lerch, Jakub Hort, Martin Vyhnálek

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaEntorhinal cortexAtrophyOrbitofrontal cortexNeuropsychologyPosterior cingulatePsychologyCognitionCognitive impairmentAlzheimer's diseaseAnterior cingulate cortexAudiologyCingulate cortexHippocampusMedicineInternal medicinePsychiatryDiseasePrefrontal cortexCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a recently developed diagnostic concept describing late‐onset persistent neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in older adults without dementia. Few studies to date investigated associations of MBI with structural brain changes. Our aim was to explore structural correlates of NPS in a non‐demented memory clinic sample using the Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI‐C) that has been developed to measure MBI. Method 116 non‐demented older adults from the Czech Brain Aging Study presenting with subjective cognitive concerns underwent a neurological, comprehensive neuropsychological examination and brain MRI and were classified as subjective cognitive decline (n=37, MMSE=29.30±0.88) or mild cognitive impairment (n=79, MMSE=26.82±2.51). The Czech version of MBI‐C was administered to participants´ informants. 1.5T MRI with T1‐weighted 3‐dimensional images and FreeSurfer 5.3. algorithm was used to measure a priori selected brain regions: thicknesses of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and entorhinal cortex (ERC) and hippocampal volume (HV) adjusted for total intracranial volume. The volumetric measures were averaged between the two hemispheres. The associations of the MBI‐C total score and five domain scores with the aforementioned regions were assessed within the whole sample using covariate‐adjusted Spearman Rank correlations. Result Significant associations of MBI‐C total score were found with HV (rho=‐.225, p=.016), ERC (rho=‐.284, p=.002) and OFC (rho=‐.214, p=.023) while controlling for sex, age and education. Both latter associations remained significant after controlling also for MMSE. We found associations of HV with both motivation (rho=‐.248, p=.008) and impulse dyscontrol scores (rho=‐.240, p=.011), ERC with impulse dyscontrol (rho=‐.368, p<.001) and OFC with motivation score (rho=‐.201, p=.033). No other associations were observed. Conclusion NPS (particularly in motivation and impulse dyscontrol domains) detected by the MBI‐C in non‐demented older adults are associated with structural changes in typical Alzheimer´s disease‐related regions. This provides supportive evidence for MBI as an early manifestation of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207