MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111893314 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-15423/v1

“Moving forward with life’: Perceived acceptability and benefits of a brief alcohol-focused intervention for people receiving antiretroviral therapy in South Africa.

2020· preprint· en· W3111893314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square (Research Square) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCommunity Health and Development
Canadian institutionsCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotivational interviewingPsychological interventionIntervention (counseling)Brief interventionMedicineRandomized controlled trialQualitative researchInterviewPsychologyFamily medicineClinical psychologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In South Africa, like other low-and middle-income countries, interventions are needed to address the impact of hazardous drinking on adherence to antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV (PLWH). Participant feedback about these interventions can identify ways to enhance their acceptability and potential impact. As part of a randomized controlled trial of a brief motivational interviewing and problem-solving therapy (MI-PST) intervention among PLWH who report hazardous drinking, we interviewed participants about their perceptions of this alcohol-reduction intervention.Methods: The trial was conducted in HIV treatment clinics operating from 6 hospitals in the Tshwane region of South Africa. In the trial, 305 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention comprising four modules of MI-PST delivered over two sessions. We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews of participants’ views about the acceptability and usefulness of the intervention for facilitating behaviour change on completion of the last intervention session and at the six-month study end-point. Twenty-four participants were interviewed after the final intervention session and 25 at the six-month follow up. Data were analysed using the framework approach. Results: Three themes emerged from the interviews that reflect participants’ perceptions of the acceptability and usefulness of this intervention. The first theme describes participants’ perceptions of the acceptability of screening and brief alcohol-focused interventions for PLWH. The second theme describes participants’ views of the usefulness of the intervention for reducing alcohol use and addressing life stressors. The third theme reflects participants’ views on how the intervention could be modified for greater reach and impact.Conclusion: Findings suggest that participants considered this intervention to be acceptable and useful for facilitating reductions in alcohol consumption. This study is the first to describe how PLWH applied the skills taught in the MI-PST intervention to manage and cope with daily problems instead of drinking heavily.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it