MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111902430 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23996

Maximization of the profit and reactant conversion considering partial pressures in an ammonia synthesis reactor using a derivative‐free method

2020· article· en· W3111902430 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kennedy B. Matos, Esdras P. Carvalho, Mauro A.S.S. Ravagnani

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMaximizationExothermic reactionAmmonia productionMathematical optimizationAmmoniaDerivative (finance)Profit maximizationPartial derivativeComputer scienceChemistryMathematicsThermodynamicsProfit (economics)EconomicsPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the present paper, an optimization model is proposed for the ammonia synthesis reactor. The reversible exothermic reaction has nitrogen and hydrogen as reactants, at high temperatures, and high pressures with iron catalyst. Two different single‐objective optimization problems were considered, the maximization of the economic return and the maximization of the nitrogen conversion. The reaction rate model was defined as a function of partial pressures of the components. The problem was coded and solved in MATLAB using a derivative‐free method after reformulating a constrained optimization problem into an unconstrained one, by penalizing the infeasibilities of the constraints in the objective functions (barrier function). The main contributions of this paper are the combination of direct‐search methods in solving the optimization problem, the evaluation of the maximum ammonia production and the temperature profile. The optimal values found were better than the ones published in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAmmonia Synthesis and Nitrogen ReductionFrench-language works237,207