Le contact peau-à-peau précoce auprès de nouveau-nés à terme : expérience vécue par des parents primipares
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction : Early skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is recommended for all healthy full-term newborns.Background : Very few studies have looked specifically at the personal experience of first-time parents when their full-term baby is born.Objectives : To describe the experience of first-time parents who engaged in early SSC with their full-term newborn, and their perception of the contribution and the role of nurses in the success of this practice.Method : This descriptive phenomenological study was carried out in a medical center in the Quebec region. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with ten parents.Results : Parents reported experiencing a series of moments filled with emotion, happiness, comfort, closeness, and intimacy. The results appear to show that an enhanced attachment bond is formed. Parents consider the contribution and the role of nurses to be essential to the success of early SSC.Discussion : It is important to strengthen, encourage, and expand the practice of early SSC among new mothers and to provide a greater opportunity for fathers to carry out this practice with their newborn in the immediate postnatal period.Conclusion : Early SSC has positive effects for both first-time parents and the newborn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".