Expanding Conversations of Race and the Nation: A Closer Look at <i>The Fish Eyes Trilogy</i> by Anita Majumdar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte multiculturel du Canada, les récits sur le passage à l’âge adulte servent souvent à construire un idéal qui, pour bien des jeunes personnes autochtones, noires et de couleur qui y grandissent, reste inatteignable. Or, il arrive souvent que les expériences des jeunes personnes racisées soient écartées. Dans cet article, Alysha Bains explore comment les trois récits formant The Fish Eyes Trilogy d’Anita Majumdar servent de stratégie de résistance à cette réalité. Comme le fait valoir Yasmin Jiwani, spécialiste féministe des médias, les stratégies de résistance nous aident à imaginer de nouvelles façons de voir le monde tel qu’il nous est souvent présenté. Pour y résister, The Fish Eyes Trilogy emploie la parodie, brouille l’homogénéité des expériences sud-asiatiques au Canada, retourne le regard blanc qui domine. La pièce en trois parties est un lieu curieux à partir duquel on peut réimaginer comment élargir et critiquer les discussions avec les jeunes au sujet de la race dans le contexte du théâtre canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.059 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".