MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111968124 · doi:10.1063/5.0027309

Thermocapillary motion of a solid cylinder near a liquid–gas interface

2020· article· en· W3111968124 on OpenAlexafffund
Alina Arslanova, Giovanniantonio Natale, Naveen Reddy, Christian Clasen, Jan Fransaer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsCylinderPhysicsMechanicsTemperature gradientSurface tensionReynolds numberConvectionThermodynamicsTurbulenceGeometryMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motion of a solid, infinitely long cylinder perpendicular to a convective liquid–gas interface due to thermocapillarity is investigated via an analytical model. If the cylinder temperature differs from the bulk temperature, a temperature gradient exists along the liquid–gas interface. This results in surface tension gradients at the liquid–gas interface, causing fluid flow around the particle, which induces propulsion. For small particles and, thus, small Péclet and Reynolds numbers, the steady-state equations for temperature and flow fields are solved exactly using two-dimensional bipolar cylindrical coordinates. The velocity of the cylinder as a function of separation distance from the liquid–gas interface is determined for the case of a constant temperature or a constant heat flux on the surface of the cylinder. A larger temperature gradient at the liquid–gas interface in the latter system leads to a larger cylinder velocity and a higher propulsion efficiency. The thermocapillary effect results in larger force on a cylinder than forces arising from other self-propulsion mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207