MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112036980 · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9282989

Long Range Underwater Localization and Navigation using Gravity-Based Measurements

2020· article· en· W3112036980 on OpenAlexafffund
Parth Pasnani, Mae Seto, Jason Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Armed Forces
KeywordsParticle filterSimultaneous localization and mappingGravimeterUnderwaterKalman filterComputer scienceExtended Kalman filterRange (aeronautics)Metric (unit)Remotely operated underwater vehicleFilter (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionControl theory (sociology)Mobile robotAerospace engineeringEngineeringRobotGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on work to assess the feasibility of gravity-based long range underwater navigation and localization. As a first step, this is explored in simulations with RAO-Blackwellized particle filter simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM). When implemented on an autonomous underwater vehicle it can operate submerged for extended periods without the use of an active sensor, thus widening the variety of AUV missions. Additionally, this work applies information theory to navigate through a region such that the SLAM data association, and thus the localization, performance is improved. The results also indicate that characteristic values for a region can be used as a SLAM metric for the region. Combining the characteristic value with information theory techniques improves the localization performance at extended ranges and is a first step towards long range underwater localization using gravimeters. Future work will optimize the particle filter, explore more sophisticated loop closures as well as hardware-in-the loop tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207