MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W311204332

Ecumenism: New Studies in North American Perspective

2004· article· en· W311204332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcumenismProtestantismPoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyReligious studiesLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the dawning of the twentieth century, ecumenical optimism and activity were booming in Canada, leading eventually to the creation of Canada's largest Protestant church in 1925, the United Church of Canada. The unprecedented organic union among Congregationalists, Methodists, and Presbyterians was the ecumenical capstone that solidified Canada's position as the most ecumenical North American country. That Canada has long been viewed as more accommodating and irenic than the United States has been well established in the scholarly literature. As the twenty-first century drew closer, there was resurgence in ecumenical pursuits in North America, even if efforts were more modest than the preparation for interdenominational organic union a century before. It was in this turn-of-the-century climate that we decided to focus scholarly attention on ecumenism in Canada, using the U.S. as a foil for some of the studies. Bringing together five scholars with expertise in the diverse fields of religious history, theology, sociology, and political science, we sought to answer several questions: What has expanded or stymied ecumenism in French and English Canada.'? How widespread is ecumenical sentiment in Canada today? Is there sufficient common ground between North American Catholics and Protestants to cooperate in the political arena? In answering these questions, we use new social scientific data and fresh historical research to shed light on ecumenism in North America. Scholarly attention in Canada has naturally been focused on the formation of the United Church, while few studies look at other forms of church union in Canada. Daniel Goodwin, Associate Professor of History at Atlantic Baptist University in Moncton, New Brunswick, addresses this dearth in the literature in his study of the formation of the United Baptist Convention of the Maritime Provinces, which brought together Arminian Baptist groups and one Calvinistic Baptist denomination in 1905-06. Goodwin demonstrates that a shared history in eighteenth-century revivalism, an emphasis on believer's baptism by immersion, the softening of radical Calvinism among Regular Baptists, and the uniting fervor of the nineteenth century, all of which were foundational in creating the ethos of the United Church of Canada, were also instrumental in creating the impetus for union among Calvinist and Arminian Baptists in Eastern Canada. Furthermore, a growing sense of regionalism, coupled with Nova Scotia's Free Baptists' rejection of a permanent merger with the American Free Will Baptists, solidified this important union. This study demonstrates, among other things, that the power of regional and cultural forces was often stronger than theological commitments in the movement for church union. Goodwin's second article focuses on the previously untold story (save for a few passing references) of the Canadian Council of Churches (C.C.C.) between 1944 and 1964. Under the dynamic leadership of William James Gallagher, the C.C.C. began with high hopes of shaping postwar reconstruction in uniquely Christian ways, so that God's Dominion would be established from sea to sea. Unfortunately for the C.C.C., the 1950's and 1960's brought increasing ambivalence toward ecumenical efforts and growing fragmentation within the Protestant camp, along with disillusionment about the capacity of churches to chart Canada's future. Goodwin explains how secularizing forces and the solidification of denominational boundaries led to the decline of ecumenical fervor and the weakening of the C.C.C. and its influence in Canada. More broadly, Goodwin illuminates how the same moral vision--to Christianize Canada through national churches--that energized unity efforts for the Baptists and the founding denominations of the United Church of Canada also motivated the creation of the C.C.C. and contributed toward the failure of its original vision by 1964. Turning to French Canada, Richard Lougheed's work on Protestant cooperation illustrates how the radically dissimilar religious contexts of Canada's two solitudes led to very different ecumenical efforts. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it