MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W311204332

Ecumenism: New Studies in North American Perspective

2004· article· en· W311204332 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel C. Goodwin, Samuel H. Reimer

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEcumenismProtestantismPoliticsPolitical scienceSociologyReligious studiesLawPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

At the dawning of the twentieth century, ecumenical optimism and activity were booming in Canada, leading eventually to the creation of Canada's largest Protestant church in 1925, the United Church of Canada. The unprecedented organic union among Congregationalists, Methodists, and Presbyterians was the ecumenical capstone that solidified Canada's position as the most ecumenical North American country. That Canada has long been viewed as more accommodating and irenic than the United States has been well established in the scholarly literature. As the twenty-first century drew closer, there was resurgence in ecumenical pursuits in North America, even if efforts were more modest than the preparation for interdenominational organic union a century before. It was in this turn-of-the-century climate that we decided to focus scholarly attention on ecumenism in Canada, using the U.S. as a foil for some of the studies. Bringing together five scholars with expertise in the diverse fields of religious history, theology, sociology, and political science, we sought to answer several questions: What has expanded or stymied ecumenism in French and English Canada.'? How widespread is ecumenical sentiment in Canada today? Is there sufficient common ground between North American Catholics and Protestants to cooperate in the political arena? In answering these questions, we use new social scientific data and fresh historical research to shed light on ecumenism in North America. Scholarly attention in Canada has naturally been focused on the formation of the United Church, while few studies look at other forms of church union in Canada. Daniel Goodwin, Associate Professor of History at Atlantic Baptist University in Moncton, New Brunswick, addresses this dearth in the literature in his study of the formation of the United Baptist Convention of the Maritime Provinces, which brought together Arminian Baptist groups and one Calvinistic Baptist denomination in 1905-06. Goodwin demonstrates that a shared history in eighteenth-century revivalism, an emphasis on believer's baptism by immersion, the softening of radical Calvinism among Regular Baptists, and the uniting fervor of the nineteenth century, all of which were foundational in creating the ethos of the United Church of Canada, were also instrumental in creating the impetus for union among Calvinist and Arminian Baptists in Eastern Canada. Furthermore, a growing sense of regionalism, coupled with Nova Scotia's Free Baptists' rejection of a permanent merger with the American Free Will Baptists, solidified this important union. This study demonstrates, among other things, that the power of regional and cultural forces was often stronger than theological commitments in the movement for church union. Goodwin's second article focuses on the previously untold story (save for a few passing references) of the Canadian Council of Churches (C.C.C.) between 1944 and 1964. Under the dynamic leadership of William James Gallagher, the C.C.C. began with high hopes of shaping postwar reconstruction in uniquely Christian ways, so that God's Dominion would be established from sea to sea. Unfortunately for the C.C.C., the 1950's and 1960's brought increasing ambivalence toward ecumenical efforts and growing fragmentation within the Protestant camp, along with disillusionment about the capacity of churches to chart Canada's future. Goodwin explains how secularizing forces and the solidification of denominational boundaries led to the decline of ecumenical fervor and the weakening of the C.C.C. and its influence in Canada. More broadly, Goodwin illuminates how the same moral vision--to Christianize Canada through national churches--that energized unity efforts for the Baptists and the founding denominations of the United Church of Canada also motivated the creation of the C.C.C. and contributed toward the failure of its original vision by 1964. Turning to French Canada, Richard Lougheed's work on Protestant cooperation illustrates how the radically dissimilar religious contexts of Canada's two solitudes led to very different ecumenical efforts. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,318
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,632

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,011
Communication savante0,0070,008
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,099
Tête enseignante GPT0,441
Écart entre enseignants0,342 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207