MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

БЕГУЩАЯ ПО ВОЛНАМ ВРЕМЕНИ: МОДЕЛЬ КАНОЭ ИЗ XIX в.

2020· article· ru· W3112050890 on OpenAlex
Арина Александровна Лебедева

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicronesianContext (archaeology)UploadConstructiveQuarter (Canadian coin)Computer scienceObject (grammar)Value (mathematics)HistoryWorld Wide WebProcess (computing)ArchaeologyEthnologyArtificial intelligenceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В корабельном фонде Центрального военного-морского музея хранится модель микронезийского каноэ, изготовленная в 1819 г. по чертежам, снятым непосредственно c судна островитян в ходе плавания Отто Евстафьевича Коцебу 1815–1818 гг. Этот предмет, реконструирующий доконтактный облик микронезийского каноэ, является чрезвычайно ценным источником по традиционной культуре мореплавания региона. Однако именно в таком качестве модель ранее не привлекала внимания исследователей. В ходе проведенной работы мы, во-первых, рассмотрели исторический контекст появления предмета, что позволило провести его атрибуцию. Во-вторых, были определены конструктивные параметры модели путем проведения обмеров и создания теоретического чертежа. Данные были конвертированы в графические программы. Микронезийские каноэ – высокотехнологичные объекты традиционной культуры, в них реализованы самобытные принципы судостроения, основанные на эмпирическом использовании островитянами законов гидро- и аэродинимики, сегодня выраженных сложными формулами и уравнениями. Поэтому для «активации» исследовательского потенциала модели необходимо оперировать этими точными техническими данными. Только такой подход может обеспечить адекватный анализ конструктивных характеристик для корректной постановки и решения вопросов, связанных c мореходными возможностями каноэ. Настоящее исследование, таким образом, задумано, как первое в серии, посвященной данному предмету. In the ship storage of the central Naval Museum there is a model of a Micronesian canoe, which dates back to the first quarter of the XIX century. The model was carved according to the scheme of Micronesian canoe that was made during the voyages of Otto von Kozebue in 1815–1818. Thus, the model is an object of exceptional value for understanding the traditional navigational culture of the region. However, the item has not been studied yet. Firstly, we attributed the model by investigating the historical context of it’s appearance in the museum collection. Then, accurate technical and constructive data were acquired by measuring of the item and making a theoretical drawing of it; the data were uploaded to digital graphic programs. Micronesian canoes are the hi-tech objects of traditional culture, which demonstrate the original shipbuilding principles, based on the empirical knowledge of physical laws of the islanders. To activate the investigative potential of the model we need to have exact technical parameters. It is the only way to analyze the constructive specifications and solve the questions of seafaring possibilities of the canoes. This publication is the first in the series, devoted to this item.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it