MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112099311 · doi:10.1177/1748006x20976802

A failure prediction model for corrosion in gas transmission pipelines

2020· article· en· W3112099311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipeline transportCorrosionPipeline (software)Natural gasForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceResidualFailure assessmentEngineeringPetroleum engineeringReliability engineeringComputer scienceStructural engineeringEnvironmental engineeringWaste managementMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmission pipelines comprise a major part of a gas network, conveying natural gas within jurisdictions, and across international boundaries. In the United States, more than 10,000 failure incidents have been reported in gas transmission pipelines in a 20-year period from 1996 to 2016 leading to a cumulative property damage of more than $748 million. Among different failure sources, corrosion is ranked as the most frequent one, corresponding to approximately a quarter of total failures. Though in-line inspection is counted as the most frequently applied corrosion monitoring technique for oil and gas pipelines, it imposes considerable costs due to the necessity of implementing frequent inspections using smart devices. For this reason, several failure prediction models have been developed to estimate the corrosion failure. However, the majorities of these prediction models rely solely on experimental tests or limited historical records which undermine the extent of their applicability and ignore pipeline environmental and geographical circumstances. The objective of this research is to develop failure prediction models for external corrosion in underground gas transmission pipelines by considering both conventional and environmental/geographical variables. For this objective, multiple regression analysis was performed on the accessible historical data reported for gas transmission pipelines. Two main climate regions of Great Plains and South East in the US were selected, and their corresponding failure prediction models were developed. Such development was based on a step by step procedure analyzing different scenarios. Considering diagnostic measures, null hypothesis and residual analysis, scenario 3 was selected as satisfactory. The validation tests of the developed models present a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.04 and 0.07 and R-Sq of 0.93 and 0.75, respectively. The results of this research can be applied in maintenance planning of gas transmission pipeline to estimate the critical time in which a pipeline may encounter external corrosion failure, and to accordingly schedule the maintenance activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it