Real-Time Formal Verification of Autonomous Systems With An FPGA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hamilton-Jacobi reachability analysis is a powerful technique used to verify the safety of autonomous systems. This method is very good at handling non-linear system dynamics with disturbances and flexible set representations. A drawback to this approach is that it suffers from the curse of dimensionality, which prevents real-time deployment on safety-critical systems. In this paper, we show that a customized hardware design on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) could accelerate 4D grid-based Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability analysis up to 16 times compared to an optimized implementation and 142 times compared to MATLAB ToolboxLS on a 16-thread CPU. Our design can overcome the complex data access pattern while taking advantage of the parallel nature of the HJ PDE computation. Because of this, we are able to achieve real-time formal verification with a 4D car model by re-solving the HJ PDE at a frequency of 5Hz on the FPGA as the environment changes. The latency of our computation is deterministic, which is crucial for safetycritical systems. Our approach presented here can be applied to different systems dynamics, and moreover, potentially leveraged for higher dimensions systems. We also demonstrate obstacle avoidance with a robot car in a changing environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".