From frustules to medusae: A new culture system for the study of the invasive hydrozoan <i>Craspedacusta sowerbii</i> in the laboratory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The invasive freshwater jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii, native from East Asia (Yangzi Jiang River), was introduced in Europe for the first time in the basins of the Royal Botanic Garden in London. From the beginning of the 20th century, worldwide reports of the presence of C. sowerbii have been increasing (USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, Russia). Despite its now worldwide distribution, C. sowerbii has rarely been the subject of recent studies. Moreover, C. sowerbii is difficult to rear in the laboratory, and individuals generally from the wild have only been reared for short periods. Many aspects of laboratory cultures have proven to be problematic for all stages of the life cycle (from frustule to medusae): lack of optimal growing system (circular current or not), water quality (physical and chemical conditions), diet (the type of food), and temperature. In this article, we present a technique for culturing all life stages of C. sowerbii, from polyps to medusae, to study its life history in the laboratory. To demonstrate the success of our culture protocol, the growth of polyps was measured for 80 days at 19 and 29°C. Colony growth increased at both temperatures in our culture system, and data were similar to those presented in the literature, illustrating the success of this protocol. Medusae were cultured for 70 days, and their bell diameter increased from 0.60 ± 0.08 mm (Day 0) to 9.0 ± 2.1 mm (Day 32). We developed a closed culture system that allowed specimens (i.e., polyps and medusae) to be maintained for more than 2 months (80 days for polyps, 72 days for medusae). This culture system will allow researchers in the future to study more precisely the metabolism (growth, ingestion, longevity) of polyps and medusae to understand life‐history characteristics important to this species' ecology (periods of medusae production, predation, and diet).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".