MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112130169 · doi:10.1101/2020.12.17.423197

DN3: An open-source Python library for large-scale raw neurophysiology data assimilation for more flexible and standardized deep learning

2020· preprint· en· W3112130169 on OpenAlexafffund
Demetres Kostas, Frank Rudzicz

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalVector InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsPython (programming language)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceSupport vector machineMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose an open-source Python library, called DN3, designed to accelerate deep learning (DL) analysis with encephalographic data. This library focuses on making experimentation rapid and reproducible and facilitates the integration of both public and private datasets. Furthermore, DN3 is designed in the interest of validating DL processes that include, but are not limited to, classification and regression across many datasets to prove capacity for generalization. We explore the effectiveness of this library by presenting a general scheme for person disambiguation called T-Vectors inspired by speech recognition. These are single vectors created by typically short, though arbitrary in length, electro-encephalographic (EEG) data sequences that uniquely identify users relative to others. T-Vectors were trained by classifying nearly 1000 people using as little as 1 second-long sequences and generalize effectively to users never seen during training. Generalized performance is demonstrated on two commonly used and publicly accessible motor imagery task datasets, which are notorious for intra- and inter-subject signal variability. According to these datasets, subjects can be identified with accuracies as high as 97.7% by simply adopting the label of the nearest neighbouring T-Vectors, with no dependence on task performed and little dependence on recording session, even when sessions are separated by days. Visualization of the T-Vectors from both datasets show no conflation of subjects between datasets, and indicates a T-Vector manifold where subjects cluster well. We first conclude that this is a desirable paradigm shift in EEG-based biometrics and secondly that this manifold deserves further investigation. Our proposed library provides a variety of essential tools that facilitated the development of T-Vectors. The T-vectors codebase serves as a template for future projects using DN3, and we encourage leveraging our provided model for future work. Author summary We present a new Python library to train deep learning (DL) models with brain data. This library is tailored, but not limited, to developing neural networks for brain-computer-interfaces (BCI) applications. There is abundant interest in leveraging DL in the wider neuroscience community, but we have found current solutions limiting. Furthermore both BCI and DL benefit from benchmarking against multiple datasets and sharing parameters. Our library tries to be accessible to DL novices, yet not limiting to experts, while making experiment configurations more easily shareable and flexible for benchmarking. We demonstrated many of the features of our library by developing a deep neural network capable of disambiguating people from arbitrary lengths of electroencephalography data. We identify a variety of future avenues of study for these representations produced by our network, particularly in biometric applications and addressing the variation in BCI classifier performance. We share our model, library and its associated guides and documentation with the community at large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207