CTNI-45. A PHASE 1B/2 CLINICAL STUDY OF NAPABUCASIN IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE FOR ADULT PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT OR PROGRESSED GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME (GBM)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Napabucasin is an orally-administered NQO1–bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including STAT3. This open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 study assessed napabucasin plus temozolomide for recurrent/progressive GBM. Phase 1b objectives were safety/tolerability, recommended phase 2 dose (primary), preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (secondary). Phase 2 objectives were preliminary antitumor activity via 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6 [20% projected]) (primary); disease control rate; median PFS; objective response rate (ORR); and overall survival (OS) (secondary). Arm A enrolled repeat surgical resection candidates; arm B enrolled patients ineligible for further resection. Patients received napabucasin (oral, 480 mg twice-daily) plus temozolomide (150 mg/m2, days 1–5, 28-day cycles). Arm A closed after 4 patients enrolled to prioritize Arm B enrollment. Arm B data are reported. Arm B enrolled/treated 30 patients (median age=56.5 [range=19–83] years; median napabucasin duration=55.0 [range=1–743] days; previous temozolomide=22 [73.3%] patients); all stopped therapy (radiologic progressive disease [PD], n=20; clinically unacceptable toxicities, n=7; follow-up loss, n=2; clinical PD, n=1). Mean relative dose intensity was 67.2% for napabucasin and 90.9% for temozolomide; 14/30 (46.7%) and 25/30 (83.3%) patients received ≥ 90% intended napabucasin and temozolomide doses, respectively. All patients reported ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE, grade ≤4); grade 3 TEAEs (≥ 10% patients) were diarrhea (23.3%, 7/30) and abdominal pain (16.7%, 5/30). One patient reported a grade 4 TEAE (seizure, treatment unrelated). PFS-6 was 28.1% (80% CI=16.8%-40.5%). Median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI=1.8–3.3), with PFS-12 and PFS-18 both 16.8% (80% CI=7.8%-28.8%). ORR was 10% (95% CI=2.1%-26.5%), with 3 partial responses, 6 stable disease, 14 PD, and 7 patients not evaluated. OS-12 was 28.3%. The napabucasin-plus-temozolomide safety profile was consistent with that anticipated for each agent. Napabucasin (480 mg twice-daily) was associated with grade 3 diarrhea and suboptimal compliance. Antitumor effects were observed per the primary endpoint in this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".