MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112148299 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200575-f

Perspectives sur l’équipement de protection individuelle dans les établissements de soins actifs durant la pandémie de COVID-19

2020· article· fr· W3112148299 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Josh Ng-Kamstra, Henry T. Stelfox, Kirsten M. Fiest, John Conly, Jeanna Parsons Leigh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceHumanitiesMedicineVirologyPhilosophyOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POINTS CLÉS En raison de la pandémie de maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) qui continue de prendre de l’ampleur, les organisations de soins de santé ont dû sélectionner l’équipement de protection individuelle (EPI) pour les travailleurs de la santé qu’elles jugeaient approprié dans

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0030.010
Research integrity0.0080.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicInfection Control and VentilationFrench-language works237,207