A Novel Spatio-Temporal Violence Classification Framework Based on Material Derivative and LSTM Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the current era, the implementation of automated security video surveillance systems is particularly needy in terms of human violence recognition. Nevertheless, the latter encounters various interlinked difficulties which require efficient solutions as well as feasible methods that provide a relevant distinction between normal human actions and abnormal ones. In this paper, we present an overview of these issues and a literature review of the related works and current research on-going efforts on this field and suggests a novel prediction model for violence recognition, based on a preliminary spatio-temporal features extraction using the material derivative which describes the rate of change of a particle while in motion with respect to time. The classification algorithm is then carried out using a deep learning LSTM technique to classify generated features into eight specified violent and non-violent categories and a prediction value for each class of action is calculated. The whole model is trained on a public dataset and its classification capacity is evaluated on a confusion matrix which assembles all the predictions made by the system with their actual labels. The obtained results are promising and show that the proposed model can be potentially useful for detecting human violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".