MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112163280 · doi:10.1101/432807

View-channel-depth light-field microscopy: real-time volumetric reconstruction of biological dynamics by deep learning

2018· preprint· en· W3112163280 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaoqiang Wang, Lanxin Zhu, Hao Zhang, Guo Li, Chengqiang Yi, Yi Li, Yicong Yang, Yichen Ding, Mei Zhen, Shangbang Gao, Tzung K. Hsiai, Peng Fei

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
FundersCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteRecruitment Program of Global ExpertsDivision of ChemistryNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMicroscopyArtificial intelligenceComputer visionLight fieldChannel (broadcasting)Temporal resolutionComputer scienceLight sheet fluorescence microscopyImage resolutionResolution (logic)Volume (thermodynamics)Depth of fieldThroughputVideo microscopyOpticsBiological systemPhysicsBiologyTelecommunicationsScanning confocal electron microscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Light-field microscopy has emerged as a technique of choice for high-speed volumetric imaging of fast biological processes. However, artefacts, non-uniform resolution, and a slow reconstruction speed have limited its full capabilities for in toto extraction of the dynamic spatiotemporal patterns in samples. Here, we combined a view-channel-depth (VCD) neural network with light-field microscopy to mitigate these limitations, yielding artefact-free three-dimensional image sequences with uniform spatial resolution and three-order-higher video-rate reconstruction throughput. We imaged neuronal activities across moving C. elegans and blood flow in a beating zebrafish heart at single-cell resolution with volume rates up to 200 Hz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207