MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112187636 · doi:10.7202/1069883ar

Le Montreal Orchestra et la création de la Société des Concerts symphoniques de Montréal (1930 - 1941)

2020· article· fr· W3112187636 on OpenAlex
Guylaine Flamand

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsCegep regional de LanaudiereCegep de Sainte Foy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La petite histoire de la création de l’Orchestre symphonique de Montréal dans les années 1930 (appelé alors Société des Concerts symphoniques de Montréal) est des plus fascinantes pour quiconque s’y intéresse. Sa relation avec l’orchestre déjà existant, le Montréal Orchestra et son chef Douglas Clarke nous offre un portrait tant musical que sociologique de deux communautés vivant côte à côte et ayant du mal à se comprendre. L’article se veut un résumé de la thèse de doctorat de l’auteure dans laquelle la formation des deux orchestres est vue en détail ainsi que le conflit qui motiva la mise sur pied des Concerts symphoniques. La dualité linguistique de Montréal est une fois de plus prise à partie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it