Identification methodology of a rate-sensitive constitutive law with mean field and full field modeling approaches for polycrystalline materials
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present paper deals with the consideration of the rate-sensitivity mechanical behavior of metallic materials, in the framework of mean field and full field homogenization approaches. We re-examine the possibility of describing properly this rate sensitivity with a simple and widely used power law expressed at the level of the slip system, and we propose a methodology to accelerate the identification of the global material constitutive law for Finite Element (FE) simulations. For such an aim, simulations of a tensile test are conducted, using a simple homogenization model (the Taylor one, used in a relaxed constraint form) and an FE code (Abaqus), both using the same single-crystal rate-dependent constitutive law. It is shown that, provided that the identification of this law is performed with care and well adapted to the examined case (rate-sensitive or insensitive materials, static and/or dynamic ranges), the simple power law can be used to simulate the macroscopic behavior of polycrystalline aggregates in a wide range of strain rate (including both static and dynamic regimes) and strain-rate sensitivity values (up the rate-insensitive limit).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it