Satisfaction face à l’aide reçue et état de santé biopsychosociale post-désastre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En juillet 1996, plusieurs adultes de 50 ans et plus vivant au Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean ont été victimes d'importantes inondations. Certains ont tout perdu ou ont subi de lourds dommages à leur domicile et à leurs biens personnels. Dans de telles circonstances, la plupart des personnes reçoivent l'aide attendue, mais certaines sont insatisfaites de l'aide reçue. Le but de cet article est d'examiner les conséquences d'un sinistre sur les conditions de vie ainsi que la santé physique et psychologique des adultes de 50 ans et plus en fonction du niveau de satisfaction face à l'aide reçue. Pour ce faire, 75 sinistrés et 57 nonsinistrés, âgés de 50 ans et plus, ont répondu à un questionnaire deux ans après les inondations. Les résultats indiquent que les répondants estimant avoir reçu moins d'aide qu'espéré sont aux prises avec des conditions de vie plus difficiles. En outre, ils ont une perception plus négative de leur état de santé physique et présentent un état de santé psychologique plus précaire que les autres groupes de répondants. Ils sont également plus nombreux que les non-sinistrés et les sinistrés satisfaits de l'aide reçue à avoir diminué la fréquence de leurs sorties sociales. Cette recherche démontre l'importance d'accorder une attention particulière aux personnes estimant ne pas recevoir suffisamment d'aide lors d'événements traumatisants, tels les désastres naturels. \n \n In July 1996 a number of adults aged 50 and older living in the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean area of Quebec were victims of serious floods. Some lost or had heavy damage to their homes and possessions. In such circumstances, most people received the aid they had expected, but some were unsatisfied with the aid they received. This article examines the consequences of a disaster on individuals' living conditions and their physical and mental health, in light of their level of satisfaction with the assistance they received. Seventy-five flood victims and 57 non-victims, aged 50 and over, responded to a questionnaire two years after the floods. The results indicate that respondents who felt they had received less aid than they hoped are also struggling with more difficult living conditions. As well, they have a more negative perception of their state of physical health and their state of mental health is more precarious than the other groups of respondents. They are also more are likely to have reduced their social activities than are non-victims and victims who were satisfied with the aid they received. This study shows the importance of paying particular attention to those who consider they have not received sufficient aid after traumatizing events such as natural disasters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.059 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".