MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112226033 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.155127

Improved two-temperature modeling of ultrafast thermal and optical phenomena in continuous and nanostructured metal films

2020· article· en· W3112226033 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Bresson, Jean‐François Bryche, Mondher Besbes, Julien Moreau, P.L. Karsenti, Paul G. Charette, Denis Morris, Michael Canva

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCollege of Natural Resources and Sciences, Humboldt State UniversityInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de LyonNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité Paris-SaclayCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinistère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'InnovationUniversité de LyonIndian National Science Academy
KeywordsMaterials scienceUltrashort pulseNanostructureNanorodLaserThermal conductionTitaniumThermalThin filmLayer (electronics)OpticsOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyComposite materialThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a pump-probe experiment is used to study the ultrafast dynamics of heat transfer in thin gold films and gold nanostructures on glass substrates, following local heating by ultrashort laser pulses. Full spectrotemporal differential reflectivity and transmission maps were obtained for different film thicknesses (30, 50, 80, 150, and 200 nm) and different laser fluences $(0.38 \mathrm{to} 9.5\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}{\mathrm{Jm}}^{\ensuremath{-}2})$. For arrays of gold nanorods, the two orthogonal probe polarizations were also acquired. We propose an improved model for these phenomena based on a modified two-temperature model that integrates thermal conduction and the three-dimensional finite element method model to link the spatiotemporal temperature maps to the spectrotemporal optical response maps. The impact of an underlying titanium adhesion layer is reported. Excellent agreement between numerical and experimental data for both the gold films and the nanostructures is shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicThermal Radiation and Cooling TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207