ILIOINGUINAL ILIOHYPOGASTRIC NERVE BLOCKS FOR POST-OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT SUBMITTED FOR GROIN SURGERY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background : evaluation of effectiveness, postoperative analgesia hemodynamic effects, recovery profiles and degree of satisfaction of both parents and surgeons to ilioin-guinal and iliohypogastric nerve blocks performed with local anaesth-tics. bupivacaine alone and with fentanyl. Methods : sixty patients, undergoing groin surgery using sevoflurane nitrous oxide anaesthesia were included . Patients were randomly allocated into 3 equal groups (n =15). Group p received normal saline at the dose of 0.3- 0.4 ml/kg for local nerve block (placebo group). Group B received 0.25%. bupivacaine at the dose of 0.3- 0.4 ml/kg as a local anaesthetic for the nerve block . Group BF received 0.25% bupivacaing at the dose of 0.3-0.4ml/kg and fentanyl at the dose of 1 ^g kg as local anaesthetic for the nerve block . Pain was evaluated by the CHEOPS pain score, "Modified Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain. Score". Recovery cariteria were assessed by Modified Aldrete Recovery Score. Results : there was significant prolongation in duration of analgesia in group BF (348 ± 15 min ) and group B (327 ± 18 min) than placebo group .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".