MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112240187 · doi:10.1213/xaa.0000000000001346

Right Ventricular Epicardial Pacing Postcardiac Surgery Can Cause Dynamic Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction: A Case Report

2020· article· en· W3112240187 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew P. Aldred, Bilel Elhaj, Yu Zeng, Étienne J. Couture, Léna Rivard, Yoan Lamarche, André Denault

Bibliographic record

VenueA&A Practice · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMontreal Heart InstituteInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentricular outflow tract obstructionCardiologyCardiopulmonary bypassPerioperativeVentricular outflow tractInternal medicineHemodynamicsCardiac surgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic right ventricular outflow tract obstruction is rare in the cardiac surgical population. Significant obstruction developing in the perioperative period can contribute to systemic hemodynamic instability. We describe 2 cases of dynamic right ventricular outflow tract obstruction that developed immediately after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, due to temporary right ventricular epicardial pacing. Both patients had systemic hypotension which improved once ventricular pacing was discontinued. We discuss the recognition of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction as a contributing factor to hemodynamic instability, as well as the importance of identifying the underlying cause such as to institute appropriate management in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueA&A PracticeSame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207