MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112241802 · doi:10.17520/biods.2004051

Distribution and bio-ecological characteristics of Abies chensiensis, an endangered plant

2004· article· en· W3112241802 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity Science · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany and Plant Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsSciencetech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndangered speciesEcologyDistribution (mathematics)Environmental scienceGeographyBiologyHabitatMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

濒危植物秦岭冷杉地理分布和生物 生态学特性研究张文辉 1 3 许晓波 2 周建云 2 孙玉玲 3 谢宗强 3 1 (天津师范大学 , 天津 300074) 2 (西北农林科技大学 , 陕西杨凌 712100) 3 (中国科学院植物研究所植被数量生态学重点实验室 , 北京 100093) 摘要 : 秦岭冷杉 ( A bies chensiensis) 为中国特有三级保护植物 ,仅岛屿化分布于陕西 、 甘肃 、 四川 、 河南的秦巴山地和 湖北神农架中高山地区 ,分布海拔 1300 -2300 m。为了对秦岭冷杉种群进行深入研究和有效保护 ,通过样地调查 和相关资料分析 ,对其地理分布 、 群落特性 、 种群特性进行了系统研究 。秦岭冷杉群落包含种子植物 40 科 63 属 102 种 ,可划分成 11 个地理区系成分 ,其中温带分布型属占 84.21 % ,热带分布型属占 15. 79 % ,温带分布是群落的 基本特性 。秦岭山区的秦岭冷杉群落可分为 5 个群丛 ,基本特点为 :生境阴湿 ;群落郁闭度大 ,结构复杂 ;种群个体 年龄差异大 ;天然更新主要发生在保护较好的阴坡林窗地段 。秦岭冷杉苗期生长缓慢 ,在 30 -70 年龄阶段 ,高生 长旺盛 ;在 40 -100 年龄阶段 ,胸径生长较快 。秦岭冷杉开始结实年龄在 30 -40 年龄阶段 ,结实间隔期为 3 -5 年 。 秦岭山区成熟个体平均产球果 8 个/ 株 ,饱满种子 56 粒/ 球果 。种群更新的关键问题是种子产量低 ,林下幼苗稀

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it