MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112275111 · doi:10.3390/fluids5040244

The Effect of Single Dielectric Barrier Discharge Actuators in Reducing Drag on an Ahmed Body

2020· article· en· W3112275111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDragActuatorDielectric barrier dischargeMechanicsAerodynamicsWakeReynolds numberMaterials sciencePlasma actuatorParasitic dragLift-to-drag ratioFlow control (data)Flow (mathematics)DielectricPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringOptoelectronicsTurbulenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The feasibility of a single dielectric barrier discharge (SDBD) actuator in controlling flow over an Ahmed body, representing a simplified car model, has been numerically and experimentally investigated at Reynolds numbers of 7.68×105 and 2.25×105. The Ahmed body had slant angles of 25∘ and 35∘. The results showed that SDBD actuators could significantly enhance the aerodynamic performance of the Ahmed body. Several arrangements of the actuators on the slant surface and the rear face of the model were examined to identify the most effective arrangement for drag reduction. This arrangement resulted in an approximately 6.1% drag reduction. This improvement in aerodynamic performance is attributed to the alteration of three-dimensional wake structures due to the presence of SDBD, which coincides with surface pressure variations on the slant and rear faces of the Ahmed body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it