MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112299185 · doi:10.1109/smc42975.2020.9283302

Trust in Multi-Vehicle Systems Using MDP Control Strategies

2020· article· en· W3112299185 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Alexis Delamer, Sidney Givigi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov decision processProtocol (science)Channel (broadcasting)EncryptionControl (management)Markov processMarkov chainComputer networkComputer securityArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a protocol that ensures trust between two vehicles in a multi-vehicle system. Trust is the implicit assessment that another vehicle will follow a predetermined strategy. The communication is done through a channel and the quantity of information transferred is guaranteed to be small. For privacy, the channel can be encrypted, but the message can only be decoded if the vehicles know the control strategy being followed. The protocol is implemented for a problem of two Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) trying to find a target in a maze. The control strategy is implemented using Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Simulations of the protocol demonstrate that communication is received and decoded by the teammates without explicitly revealing the tactics being used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207